La revista Regulation & Governance -regulación y gobernanza-presenta en su último número un artículo de B. Bull que estudia los efectos de la liberalización comercial -por efectos de tratados de comercio- y la desregulación, con el caso de Chile -en materia laboral y ambiental- (desde 1990...)
- It is currently widely recognized that trade liberalization leads not only to deregulation but also to re-regulation. However, it is less well understood how trade agreements and trade liberalization affect domestic regulatory institutions. This article aims to contribute to such an understanding through a case study of Chile. Since 1990, Chile has pursued a strategy of economic integration through bilateral, regional, and multilateral agreements. The study shows how this strategy has led to the partial implementation of a patchwork of competing regulatory institutions, many of which can trace their roots to the domestically preferred institutions of Chile’s major trading partners.
- "In sum, the case of Chile shows that trade agreements have both potential and limitations as regulatory devices. The formal regulatory provisions in the agreements have so far had a quite limited impact on regulation of labor and the environment in Chile. However, the informal interaction between state and non-state actors during negotiation and implementation of the agreements, as well as the subsequent market integration, have contributed to the strengthening of labor and environmental regulation in Chile."
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario